Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dentons in DeutschlandDentons in Deutschland
VS
DLA PiperDLA Piper
Dentons in Deutschland

Dentons in Deutschland

Berlin, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, München, DE

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dentons.com/de
753/1000Fair

In über 80 Ländern unterstützt Dentons Sie mit einer einzigartig globalen Aufstellung und lokal exzellenten Rechtsberatung bei allen Wachstumsbestrebungen, der Abwehr von Risiken, im operativen Geschäft und in sämtlichen Finanzierungsfragen. Dabei engagieren wir uns für...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Global, GB

Last Update: 08/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com
783/1000Fair

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:13,425
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dentons in Deutschland

Dentons in Deutschland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dentons in Deutschland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dentons in Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentons in Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dentons in Deutschland

Dentons in Deutschland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland company and DLA Piper company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dentons in Deutschland or DLA Piper ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dentons in Deutschland or DLA Piper ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland and DLA Piper, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dentons in Deutschland and DLA Piper, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2