Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DentaQuestDentaQuest
VS
Provincial Health Services AuthorityProvincial Health Services Authority
DentaQuest

DentaQuest

96 Worcester St, Wellesley Hills, 02481, US

Last Update: 05/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.dentaquest.com
606/1000Poor

DentaQuest, part of Sun Life U.S., is a purpose-driven health care company dedicated to improving the oral health of all. We do this through Preventistry® — our inclusive approach to quality care and expanded access built on trusted partnerships between patients, provid...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,410
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

200-1333 West Broadway, Vancouver, V6H 4C1, CA

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phsa.ca
781/1000Fair

Canada's first provincial health services authority. Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) is one of six health authorities – the other five health authorities serve geographic regions of BC. PHSA's primary role is to ensure that BC residents have access to a coo...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,531
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DentaQuest

DentaQuest

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

DentaQuest has 41.84% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provincial Health Services Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DentaQuest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DentaQuest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Provincial Health Services Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provincial Health Services Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DentaQuest

DentaQuest

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1780568638
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1779855877
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DEN1780676951
Provincial Health Services Authority

Provincial Health Services Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DentaQuest company and Provincial Health Services Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DentaQuest and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DentaQuest and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DentaQuest or Provincial Health Services Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DentaQuest or Provincial Health Services Authority ?
Between DentaQuest and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DentaQuest and Provincial Health Services Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2