Comparison Overview

Dental Press Editora

VS

MIT Technology Review

Dental Press Editora

Av. Luiz Teixeira Mendes, Maringá, Paraná, 87015001, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dentalpress.com.br

Created on Sep. 1st, in 1990, the Dental Press International is a publishing company specialized in oral health. It publishes journals in four areas of dentistry and books about several themes. The articles published in the journals are written by researches from all country, some of them are very known professors at the best Universities in Brazil. The company is located in Maringá - PR.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MIT Technology Review

1 Main St, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.technologyreview.com/

Founded at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1899, MIT Technology Review is a digitally oriented independent media company whose analysis, features, reviews, interviews, and live events explain the commercial, social, and political impact of new technologies. MIT Technology Review readers are curious technology enthusiasts—a global audience of business and thought leaders, innovators and early adopters, entrepreneurs and investors. Every day, we provide an authoritative filter for the flood of information about technology. We are the first to report on a broad range of new technologies, informing our audiences about how important breakthroughs will impact their careers and their lives. Get our journalism: http://technologyreview.com/newsletters.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1,303
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dental-press-editora.jpeg
Dental Press Editora
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-technology-review.jpeg
MIT Technology Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dental Press Editora
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MIT Technology Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dental Press Editora in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Technology Review in 2025.

Incident History — Dental Press Editora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dental Press Editora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MIT Technology Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Technology Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dental-press-editora.jpeg
Dental Press Editora
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-technology-review.jpeg
MIT Technology Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MIT Technology Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dental Press Editora company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MIT Technology Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dental Press Editora company.

In the current year, MIT Technology Review company and Dental Press Editora company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MIT Technology Review company nor Dental Press Editora company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MIT Technology Review company nor Dental Press Editora company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MIT Technology Review company nor Dental Press Editora company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dental Press Editora company nor MIT Technology Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MIT Technology Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dental Press Editora company.

MIT Technology Review company employs more people globally than Dental Press Editora company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dental Press Editora nor MIT Technology Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References