Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DENPAFLUXDENPAFLUX
VS
ST EngineeringST Engineering
DENPAFLUX

DENPAFLUX

Rosenheimer Street 116a, Munich, 81669, DE

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.denpaflux.com/
749/1000Moderate

DENPAFLUX is the modern way for solving EMC/EMI challenges at any stage of hardware development. We provide electronic companies with easy access to professional EMC experts, faster EMC analysis reports, dedicated live sessions with EMC experts, custom EMC training and ...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:25
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ST Engineering

ST Engineering

ST Engineering Hub, Singapore, 567710, SG

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stengg.com
798/1000Fair

At ST Engineering, we apply our technology and innovation to solve real-world problems and improve lives. Our commitment to excellence and our track record as a global technology, defence, and engineering company earns us a reputation for quality and trust. Subsc...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:17,756
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DENPAFLUX

DENPAFLUX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ST Engineering

ST Engineering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DENPAFLUX in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ST Engineering in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DENPAFLUX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DENPAFLUX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ST Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ST Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DENPAFLUX

DENPAFLUX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ST Engineering

ST Engineering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DENPAFLUX company and ST Engineering company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DENPAFLUX and ST Engineering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DENPAFLUX and ST Engineering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DENPAFLUX or ST Engineering ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DENPAFLUX or ST Engineering ?
Between DENPAFLUX and ST Engineering, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DENPAFLUX and ST Engineering, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8