Comparison Overview
Denodo

Denodo
525 University Avenue, Suite 31, Palo Alto, CA, US, 94301
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Denodo is a leader in data management – transforming data into trustworthy insights and outcomes for all, including both AI and end users – providing unmatched performance, unified access to the broadest range of enterprise, big data, cloud and unstructured sources, and...

Alibaba.com
699 Wang Shang Road, Hangzhou, 310052, CN
Last Update: 07/10/2026
The first business of Alibaba Group, Alibaba.com (www.alibaba.com) is the leading platform for global wholesale trade serving millions of buyers and suppliers around the world. Through Alibaba.com, small businesses can sell their products to companies in other countries...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Denodo







Alibaba.com






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Denodo in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Alibaba.com in 2026.
Incident History - Denodo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Denodo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Alibaba.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Alibaba.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Denodo

Alibaba.com
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.