Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Delvag Versicherungs-AGDelvag Versicherungs-AG
VS
Liberty Mutual InsuranceLiberty Mutual Insurance
Delvag Versicherungs-AG

Delvag Versicherungs-AG

Venloer Str. 151-153, Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, 50672, DE

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.delvag.de
751/1000Fair

Wir bei der Delvag Versicherungs-AG sind der Versicherer in der Lufthansa Group und eine 100-prozentige Tochtergesellschaft der Deutschen Lufthansa AG. Mit unserem Firmensitz im Herzen von Köln sind wir als Risikoträger schwerpunktmäßig in den Sparten Luftfahrt- und Tra...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:111
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Liberty Mutual Insurance

Liberty Mutual Insurance

175 Berkeley Street, Boston, 02116, US

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
690/1000Weak

At Liberty Mutual, we believe progress happens when people feel secure. For more than 110 years we have helped people and businesses embrace today and confidently pursue tomorrow by providing protection for the unexpected and delivering it with care. A Fortune 100 c...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:37,904
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Delvag Versicherungs-AG

Delvag Versicherungs-AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Liberty Mutual Insurance

Liberty Mutual Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delvag Versicherungs-AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Liberty Mutual Insurance has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Delvag Versicherungs-AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delvag Versicherungs-AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Liberty Mutual Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liberty Mutual Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Delvag Versicherungs-AG

Delvag Versicherungs-AG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Liberty Mutual Insurance

Liberty Mutual Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LIB1779359744
🔒 Incident : Breach
LIB001072625

FAQ

Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG company and Liberty Mutual Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG and Liberty Mutual Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG and Liberty Mutual Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Delvag Versicherungs-AG or Liberty Mutual Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Delvag Versicherungs-AG or Liberty Mutual Insurance ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG and Liberty Mutual Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Delvag Versicherungs-AG and Liberty Mutual Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1