Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Delta Intelligent Building TechnologiesDelta Intelligent Building Technologies
VS
Rete Ferroviaria ItalianaRete Ferroviaria Italiana
Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

178 Bauer Dr, Oakland, 07436, US

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies (DIBT) stands at the forefront of building automation, proudly leveraging the collective strength of Delta Electronics' esteemed brands. Our mission is to unify and enhance building environments with customizable solutions that pr...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rete Ferroviaria Italiana

Rete Ferroviaria Italiana

Piazza della Croce Rossa, 1, Rome, IT, 00161

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rfi.it
787/1000Fair

Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (RFI) is the Company of the Ferrovie dello Stato Group with the public role of Infrastructure Manager. As the body responsible for the track, the stations and the installations, RFI ensures to Italian railway undertakings the access to the rail...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:12,434
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rete Ferroviaria Italiana

Rete Ferroviaria Italiana

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delta Intelligent Building Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rete Ferroviaria Italiana in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Delta Intelligent Building Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rete Ferroviaria Italiana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rete Ferroviaria Italiana

Rete Ferroviaria Italiana

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies company and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Delta Intelligent Building Technologies or Rete Ferroviaria Italiana ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Delta Intelligent Building Technologies or Rete Ferroviaria Italiana ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Delta Intelligent Building Technologies and Rete Ferroviaria Italiana, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1