Comparison Overview
Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies
178 Bauer Dr, Oakland, 07436, US
Last Update: 08/02/2026
Delta Intelligent Building Technologies (DIBT) stands at the forefront of building automation, proudly leveraging the collective strength of Delta Electronics' esteemed brands. Our mission is to unify and enhance building environments with customizable solutions that pr...

Cintas
6800 Cintas Blvd, Mason, 45040, US
Last Update: 05/06/2026
Cintas Corporation, a Fortune 500 company headquartered in Cincinnati, specializes in helping businesses of all sizes get Ready™ for the Workday®. We provide a comprehensive range of products and services, including uniforms, mats, mops, towels, restroom supplies, workp...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies







Cintas






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Delta Intelligent Building Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cintas in 2026.
Incident History - Delta Intelligent Building Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Delta Intelligent Building Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cintas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cintas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Delta Intelligent Building Technologies

Cintas
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.