Comparison Overview
Delta Air Lines

Delta Air Lines
1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, 30320-6001, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) is the U.S. global airline leader in safety, innovation, reliability and customer experience. Powered by our employees around the world, Delta has for a decade led the airline industry in operational excellence while maintaining our reputatio...

LATAM Airlines
Avenida Presidente Riesco 5711, Edificio Huidobro, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, CL, 7561114
Last Update: 04/10/2026
We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Delta Air Lines







LATAM Airlines






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
Delta Air Lines has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LATAM Airlines in 2026.
Incident History - Delta Air Lines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Delta Air Lines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - LATAM Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LATAM Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Delta Air Lines

LATAM Airlines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.