Comparison Overview
Deloitte Government & Public Services

Deloitte Government & Public Services
1919 N Lynn St, Arlington, 22209, US
Last Update: 24/04/2026
Connecting with clients on a more personal level has been a cornerstone of how Deloitte operates for more than 175 years. Today, our Government & Public Services practice – our people, ideas and technologies — connect for impact to help government, higher education and ...

KPMG UK
15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, GB
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Make growth happen. Make it trusted. Make bold moves. Make the future. KPMG makes the difference for our clients, people and communities. Make growth happen. Make it trusted. Make bold moves. Make the future. At KPMG, we’ve been making the difference for our clients, p...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Deloitte Government & Public Services







KPMG UK






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deloitte Government & Public Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KPMG UK in 2026.
Incident History - Deloitte Government & Public Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deloitte Government & Public Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - KPMG UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KPMG UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Deloitte Government & Public Services

KPMG UK
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.