Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deloitte Government & Public ServicesDeloitte Government & Public Services
VS
Advantage SolutionsAdvantage Solutions
Deloitte Government & Public Services

Deloitte Government & Public Services

1919 N Lynn St, Arlington, 22209, US

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
571/1000Very Poor

Connecting with clients on a more personal level has been a cornerstone of how Deloitte operates for more than 175 years. Today, our Government & Public Services practice – our people, ideas and technologies — connect for impact to help government, higher education and ...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Advantage Solutions

Advantage Solutions

8001 Forsyth Blvd, Suite 1025, St Louis, Missouri, US, 63105

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.yourADV.com
749/1000Moderate

At Advantage Solutions, we're the unseen architects behind your everyday purchases. From pantry staples to your online shopping carts, we ensure your favorite goods are always in stock and within reach by connecting manufacturers to the right retailers and teaming up wi...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:27,507
Subsidiaries:45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deloitte Government & Public Services

Deloitte Government & Public Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Advantage Solutions

Advantage Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deloitte Government & Public Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advantage Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deloitte Government & Public Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deloitte Government & Public Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Advantage Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advantage Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deloitte Government & Public Services

Deloitte Government & Public Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEL1777062709
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEL1768842388
Advantage Solutions

Advantage Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services company and Advantage Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services and Advantage Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services and Advantage Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deloitte Government & Public Services or Advantage Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deloitte Government & Public Services or Advantage Solutions ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services and Advantage Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deloitte Government & Public Services and Advantage Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9