Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dell TechnologiesDell Technologies
VS
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦
Dell Technologies

Dell Technologies

One Dell Way, Round Rock, 78682, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
839/1000Good

Our technology is intelligent, secure, and built for you. So, you can focus on what matters most.

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:123,588
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

TW

Last Update: 26/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.quantatw.com
744/1000Moderate

Established in 1988, Quanta Computer is the largest notebook computer ODM company in the world. With leading technology and strong R&D capability, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets and the best partner providing quality design and manufacturing services to t...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:11,080
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dell Technologies

Dell Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dell Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dell Technologies

Dell Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
QUA15716222

FAQ

Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dell Technologies company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dell Technologies and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dell Technologies and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dell Technologies or Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dell Technologies or Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 ?
Between Dell Technologies and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dell Technologies and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA