Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Délégation du Québec en ItalieDélégation du Québec en Italie
VS
I work for NSWI work for NSW
Délégation du Québec en Italie

Délégation du Québec en Italie

Via delle Quattro Fontane, 16, Rome, 00184, IT

Last Update: 06/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://quebec.ca/rome
757/1000Fair

La Délégation du Québec en Italie soutient et promeut, depuis 1965, le développement de projets d’affaires, de recherche et d’innovation entre le Québec et l’Italie. Le bureau économique et commercial de la délégation travaille en étroite collaboration avec de nombreux ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:45
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
I work for NSW

I work for NSW

Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.nsw.gov.au/
795/1000Fair

The NSW public sector includes ten departments and many agencies and organisations working together to develop policy and deliver important services such as health, education, housing, transport and infrastructure across NSW. We are over 300,000 dedicated people who sh...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:63,341
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Délégation du Québec en Italie

Délégation du Québec en Italie

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
I work for NSW

I work for NSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Délégation du Québec en Italie in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I work for NSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Délégation du Québec en Italie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Délégation du Québec en Italie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - I work for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I work for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Délégation du Québec en Italie

Délégation du Québec en Italie

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
I work for NSW

I work for NSW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie company and I work for NSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie and I work for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie and I work for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Délégation du Québec en Italie or I work for NSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Délégation du Québec en Italie or I work for NSW ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie and I work for NSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Délégation du Québec en Italie and I work for NSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2