Comparison Overview

Delaware Art Museum

VS

Columbus Museum of Art

Delaware Art Museum

2301 Kentmere Parkway, Wilmington, 19806, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Delaware Art Museum is to connect people to art, offering an inclusive and essential community resource that through its collections, exhibitions, and programs, generates creative energy that sustains, enriches, empowers, and inspires. For over 100 years, DelArt has served as a primary arts and cultural institution in Delaware. It is alive with experiences, discoveries, and activities to connect people with art and with each other. Originally created in 1912 to honor the renowned illustrator and Wilmington-native, Howard Pyle, the Museum’s collection has grown to over 12,000 works of art in our building and sculpture garden. Also recognized for British Pre-Raphaelite art, the Museum is home to the most comprehensive Pre-Raphaelite collection on display outside of the United Kingdom, and a growing collection of significant contemporary art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Columbus Museum of Art

480 East Broad Street, Columbus, 43215, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Columbus Museum of Art’s mission is to create great experiences with great art for everyone. Whether we are presenting an exhibition, designing an art-making activity, or giving visitors directions, we are guided by a vision to connect people and art. CMA nurtures that connection and removes barriers between our community and our collection. CMA’s galleries are filled with works that manifest creativity. Our collection includes outstanding late nineteenth and early twentieth-century American and European modern works of art. We house the world’s largest collections of works by beloved local artists Aminah Brenda Lynn Robinson, Elijah Pierce, and George Bellows; and acclaimed collections such as The Photo League and the Philip and Suzanne Schiller Collection of American Social Commentary Art. A commitment to contemporary art, folk art, glass, and photography continues the Museum’s dedication to showcasing art of our time. CMA is where creativity and the daily life of our community intersect and thrive, as we champion new and different ways of thinking and doing. We celebrate the creative process and provide opportunities for people to cultivate and discover the value of creativity in their own lives.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delaware-art-museum.jpeg
Delaware Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbus-museum-of-art.jpeg
Columbus Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Delaware Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Columbus Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delaware Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Columbus Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Delaware Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delaware Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Columbus Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Columbus Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delaware-art-museum.jpeg
Delaware Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/columbus-museum-of-art.jpeg
Columbus Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Columbus Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Delaware Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Columbus Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Delaware Art Museum company.

In the current year, Columbus Museum of Art company and Delaware Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art company nor Delaware Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art company nor Delaware Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Columbus Museum of Art company nor Delaware Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Delaware Art Museum company nor Columbus Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Delaware Art Museum company nor Columbus Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Columbus Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Delaware Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Delaware Art Museum nor Columbus Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H