Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Groupe DelachauxGroupe Delachaux
VS
GRUNDFOSGRUNDFOS
Groupe Delachaux

Groupe Delachaux

307, Rue d'Estienne d'Orves, Colombes, 92700, FR

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.delachaux.com
745/1000Moderate

Delachaux is a global, family-owned industrial group who invests for the long-term in companies working with cutting-edge skills and technology, positioned as leaders in their specific markets. Through its 5 Businesses, Pandrol, Frauscher, Conductix-Wampfler, DCX Chrome...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:107
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GRUNDFOS

GRUNDFOS

Poul Due Jensens Vej 7, Bjerringbro, Middle Jutland, DK, 8850

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
777/1000Fair

We’re a global leader in water solutions. Every day, our intelligent, energy-saving pumps and water solutions help provide comfort, deliver drinking water, remove wastewater or sustain crops all over the world. We want to ensure water is accessible and reliable for all....

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:13,941
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Groupe Delachaux

Groupe Delachaux

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GRUNDFOS

GRUNDFOS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Groupe Delachaux in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRUNDFOS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Groupe Delachaux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Groupe Delachaux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GRUNDFOS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRUNDFOS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Groupe Delachaux

Groupe Delachaux

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GRUNDFOS

GRUNDFOS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Groupe Delachaux company and GRUNDFOS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Groupe Delachaux and GRUNDFOS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Groupe Delachaux and GRUNDFOS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Groupe Delachaux or GRUNDFOS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Groupe Delachaux or GRUNDFOS ?
Between Groupe Delachaux and GRUNDFOS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Groupe Delachaux and GRUNDFOS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2