Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

De Klok DrankenDe Klok Dranken
VS
PRAN-RFL GroupPRAN-RFL Group
De Klok Dranken

De Klok Dranken

Fort Blauwkapel 6, Almere, undefined, 1358 DB, NL

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.deklokdranken.nl
762/1000Fair

De grootste drankenhandel van Nederland. De Klok Dranken is een professionele drankengroothandel met nationale dekking maar ook lokale toegankelijkheid. De Klok Dranken biedt keuze, kennis en service vanuit ervaring en is hierdoor de ideale partner voor iedere ondernem...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:95
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PRAN-RFL Group

PRAN-RFL Group

PRAN-RFL Center, 105, Middle Badda, Dhaka, BD, 1212

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pranfoods.net/
794/1000Fair

PRAN RFL Group, one of the most reputed conglomerates in Bangladesh, is in market since 1981. It started mainly with Foundry business and gradually diversified to Light Engineering, PVC Fittings, Plastics, Food and Beverage and Agro-Processing. It has it's marketing and...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:19,489
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
De Klok Dranken

De Klok Dranken

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PRAN-RFL Group

PRAN-RFL Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for De Klok Dranken in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PRAN-RFL Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - De Klok Dranken (X = Date, Y = Severity)

De Klok Dranken cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PRAN-RFL Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PRAN-RFL Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
De Klok Dranken

De Klok Dranken

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PRAN-RFL Group

PRAN-RFL Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between De Klok Dranken company and PRAN-RFL Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between De Klok Dranken and PRAN-RFL Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between De Klok Dranken and PRAN-RFL Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - De Klok Dranken or PRAN-RFL Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - De Klok Dranken or PRAN-RFL Group ?
Between De Klok Dranken and PRAN-RFL Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between De Klok Dranken and PRAN-RFL Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9