Comparison Overview
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, GB, SW1P 3JR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is the UK government department responsible for policy and regulations on environmental, food and rural issues. We are responsible for policy and regulations on: - the natural environment, biodiversity...
USDA
1400 Independence Ave, Washington, 20250, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The United States Department of Agriculture is the United States federal executive department responsible for developing and executing U.S. federal government policy on farming, agriculture, and food. It aims to meet the needs of farmers and ranchers, promote agricultur...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
USDA
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for USDA in 2026.
Incident History - Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - USDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
USDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
USDA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.