Comparison Overview
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, GB, SW1P 3JR
Last Update: 28/03/2026
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is the UK government department responsible for policy and regulations on environmental, food and rural issues. We are responsible for policy and regulations on: - the natural environment, biodiversity...

Ministero dell'Interno
IT
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Il ministero dell'Interno è una struttura complessa il cui assetto organizzativo è disciplinato dal D.L.vo n. 300/99 e dai provvedimenti attuativi. A livello centrale, si articola in uffici di diretta collaborazione con il ministro (D.P.R. n. 98/2002) e cinque dipartime...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs







Ministero dell'Interno






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ministero dell'Interno in 2026.
Incident History - Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ministero dell'Interno (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ministero dell'Interno cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Ministero dell'Interno
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.