Comparison Overview
Defra digital, data, technology and security

Defra digital, data, technology and security
England, GB
Last Update: 26/02/2026
We are the trusted teams for developing and delivering digital, data, technology and security solutions across the entire Defra group of organisations. We have around 1,200 colleagues, including programme and project managers, digital developers, data analysts, user re...

AlmavivA Group
Via di Casal Boccone, 188-190, Roma, IT, 00137
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Almaviva is the Italian digital innovation group that supports the country’s growth by helping enterprises meet the challenges of staying competitive in the digital age. The Group helps organizations transform their business models, operational structures, corporate cul...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Defra digital, data, technology and security







AlmavivA Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Defra digital, data, technology and security in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Group in 2026.
Incident History - Defra digital, data, technology and security (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Defra digital, data, technology and security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AlmavivA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AlmavivA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Defra digital, data, technology and security

AlmavivA Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.
Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.
The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.