Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Defense Security Cooperation AgencyDefense Security Cooperation Agency
VS
U.S. Coast GuardU.S. Coast Guard
Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

2800 Defense Pentagon, Washington, 20301, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dsca.mil
736/1000Moderate

The mission of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is to advance U.S. national security and foreign policy interests by building the capacity of foreign security forces to respond to shared challenges. DSCA leads the broader U.S. security cooperation enterpr...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:465
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
U.S. Coast Guard

U.S. Coast Guard

2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, US, 20593

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uscg.mil
780/1000Fair

Official LinkedIn account of the U.S. Coast Guard — The Nation’s premier maritime military service and leading counter-drug force, protecting the maritime domain and advancing national security in service to the American people. Semper Paratus! As one of the six branch...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:32,242
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
U.S. Coast Guard

U.S. Coast Guard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Defense Security Cooperation Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Coast Guard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Defense Security Cooperation Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defense Security Cooperation Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - U.S. Coast Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Coast Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEF000101524
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEF000101824
U.S. Coast Guard

U.S. Coast Guard

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and U.S. Coast Guard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and U.S. Coast Guard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and U.S. Coast Guard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Defense Security Cooperation Agency or U.S. Coast Guard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Defense Security Cooperation Agency or U.S. Coast Guard ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and U.S. Coast Guard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and U.S. Coast Guard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA