Comparison Overview

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

VS

U.S. Coast Guard

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

2800 Defense Pentagon, None, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20301
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 700 and 749

The mission of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is to advance U.S. national security and foreign policy interests by building the capacity of foreign security forces to respond to shared challenges. DSCA leads the broader U.S. security cooperation enterprise in its efforts to train, educate, advise, and equip foreign partners. DSCA administers security cooperation programs that support U.S. policy interests and objectives identified by the White House, Department of Defense, and Department of State. These objectives include developing specific partner capabilities, building alliances and partnerships, and facilitating U.S. access. DSCA integrates security cooperation activities in support of a whole-of-government approach; provides execution guidance to DoD entities that implement security cooperation programs; exercises financial and program management for the Foreign Military Sales system and many other security cooperation programs; and educates and provides for the long-term development of the security cooperation workforce. Programs-at-a-glance include: • Foreign Military Sales (FMS) • Foreign Military Financing (FMF) • Institutional Capacity Building (ICB) • International Military Education and Training (IMET) • Humanitarian Assistance, Disaster Relief and Mine Action (HDM) http://dodcio.defense.gov/SocialMedia/UserAgreement.aspx For more information on DSCA, e-mail: [email protected]

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 453
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

U.S. Coast Guard

2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, US, 20593
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Official LinkedIn account of the U.S. Coast Guard — The Nation’s premier maritime military service and leading counter-drug force, protecting the maritime domain and advancing national security in service to the American people. Semper Paratus! As one of the six branches of the Armed Forces, the U.S. Coast Guard is vital to our nation's safety and security. U.S. Coast Guard personnel are the backbone of America’s maritime security. The U.S. Coast Guard employs a topnotch civilian workforce, with more than 7,000 positions in nearly 100 locations nationwide. Search for Jobs and Internships at USAJobs.gov.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 31,712
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defense-security-cooperation-agency.jpeg
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uscoastguard.jpeg
U.S. Coast Guard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Coast Guard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Defense Security Cooperation Agency in 2026.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Coast Guard in 2026.

Incident History — Defense Security Cooperation Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defense Security Cooperation Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Coast Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Coast Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defense-security-cooperation-agency.jpeg
Defense Security Cooperation Agency
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails with malicious URLs
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Spear-phishing, Malware Delivery
Motivation: Espionage, Potential Profit
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uscoastguard.jpeg
U.S. Coast Guard
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Whistleblower Leak
Motivation: Accountability for law enforcement actions, reform of ICE and CBP
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
Motivation: Suppression of leaked data
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force attacks, Password spraying, MFA fatigue (push bombing)
Motivation: Retaliation for U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Financial gain (ransomware payments), Political/ideological (anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

U.S. Coast Guard company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Defense Security Cooperation Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Coast Guard company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Defense Security Cooperation Agency company.

In the current year, U.S. Coast Guard company has reported more cyber incidents than Defense Security Cooperation Agency company.

U.S. Coast Guard company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Defense Security Cooperation Agency company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Coast Guard company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Defense Security Cooperation Agency company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both U.S. Coast Guard company and Defense Security Cooperation Agency company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

U.S. Coast Guard company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Defense Security Cooperation Agency company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Coast Guard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Defense Security Cooperation Agency company.

U.S. Coast Guard company employs more people globally than Defense Security Cooperation Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Defense Security Cooperation Agency nor U.S. Coast Guard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.