Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Defense Security Cooperation AgencyDefense Security Cooperation Agency
VS
United States Marine CorpsUnited States Marine Corps
Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

2800 Defense Pentagon, Washington, 20301, US

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dsca.mil
736/1000Moderate

The mission of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is to advance U.S. national security and foreign policy interests by building the capacity of foreign security forces to respond to shared challenges. DSCA leads the broader U.S. security cooperation enterpr...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:465
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
United States Marine Corps

United States Marine Corps

3000 Marine Corps Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US

Last Update: 01/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marines.mil/
780/1000Fair

The United States Marine Corps (USMC) is a branch of the United States Armed Forces responsible for providing power projection, using the mobility of the United States Navy, by Congressional mandate, to deliver rapidly, combined-arms task forces on land, at sea, and in ...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:74,252
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
United States Marine Corps

United States Marine Corps

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Defense Security Cooperation Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

United States Marine Corps has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Defense Security Cooperation Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defense Security Cooperation Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Marine Corps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Marine Corps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Defense Security Cooperation Agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEF000101524
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEF000101824
United States Marine Corps

United States Marine Corps

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARU-SUSS1780346496

FAQ

Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency company and United States Marine Corps company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and United States Marine Corps, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and United States Marine Corps, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Defense Security Cooperation Agency or United States Marine Corps ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Defense Security Cooperation Agency or United States Marine Corps ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and United States Marine Corps, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Defense Security Cooperation Agency and United States Marine Corps, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA