Comparison Overview
Defense Logistics Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, 22060, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
As the nation’s logistics combat support agency, the DLA manages the end-to-end global defense supply chain – from raw materials to end user disposition – for the five military services, 11 combatant commands, other federal, state and local agencies and partner and alli...
United States Department of War
Washington, DC, US
Last Update: 27/09/2026
The mission of the Department of War is to provide military forces necessary to protect the security of our country. The U.S. military defends the homeland, deters adversaries, and builds security around the world by projecting U.S. influence and working with allies and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Defense Logistics Agency
United States Department of War
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Defense Logistics Agency in 2026.
Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for United States Department of War in 2026.
Incident History - Defense Logistics Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Defense Logistics Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - United States Department of War (X = Date, Y = Severity)
United States Department of War cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Defense Logistics Agency
United States Department of War
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.