Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)
VS
RheinmetallRheinmetall
Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)

Rajaji Marg, New Delhi, 110011, IN

Last Update: 24/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.drdo.gov.in
819/1000Good

The Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) (IAST: Raksa Anusandhan Evam Vikas Sangathan) is the premier agency under the Department of Defence Research and Development in Ministry of Defence of the Government of India, charged with the military's research an...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:202
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall Platz 1, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein Westfalen, DE, 40476

Last Update: 16/09/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

As an integrated technology group, the listed company Rheinmetall AG, headquartered in Düsseldorf, stands for a company that is as strong in substance as it is successful internationally, and that is active in various markets with an innovative range of products and ser...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:14,311
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rheinmetall in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rheinmetall (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rheinmetall cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEF1787574547
Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RHE73630723
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
RHE2352823

FAQ

Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) company and Rheinmetall company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Rheinmetall, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Rheinmetall, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) or Rheinmetall ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) or Rheinmetall ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Rheinmetall, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Rheinmetall, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8