Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Defence Research and Development OrganisationDefence Research and Development Organisation
VS
SaabSaab
Defence Research and Development Organisation

Defence Research and Development Organisation

414006, IN

Last Update: 27/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.drdo.org
814/1000Good

It is an Govt Organisation

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:3,374
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Saab

Saab

Olof Palmes gata 17, Stockholm, SE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://saab.com
799/1000Fair

As a leading defence and security company, we offer solutions that range from the depths of the oceans to high in the sky, on land and in cyberspace, to keep people and society safe. Empowered by our 22,000 talented people, we constantly push the boundaries of technolo...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,468
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Defence Research and Development Organisation

Defence Research and Development Organisation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Saab

Saab

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Defence Research and Development Organisation has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saab in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Defence Research and Development Organisation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Defence Research and Development Organisation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Saab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Defence Research and Development Organisation

Defence Research and Development Organisation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEF1785177445
Saab

Saab

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation company and Saab company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation and Saab, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation and Saab, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Defence Research and Development Organisation or Saab ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Defence Research and Development Organisation or Saab ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation and Saab, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Defence Research and Development Organisation and Saab, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3