Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DeezerDeezer
VS
Yamaha CorporationYamaha Corporation
Deezer

Deezer

24, Rue de Calais, Paris, 75009, FR

Last Update: 23/07/2026

View Profile
301/1000Critical

Deezer is one of the world’s largest independent music experiences platforms, connecting fans with artists and creating ways for people to Live the music. The company provides access to a full-range catalog of high quality music, lossless HiFi audio and industry-definin...

NAICS:71113
NAICS Definition:Musical Groups and Artists
Employees:1,095
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

10-1 Nakazawacho, Naka Ward, , Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, JP, 430-0904

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.yamaha.com/
786/1000Fair

Our history began in 1887 when Yamaha founder Torakusu Yamaha completed a repair job on a reed organ at a Japanese primary school. Perhaps no one thought at the time that this event would mark the beginning of 130-plus year history during which Yamaha would become a wor...

NAICS:71113
NAICS Definition:Musical Groups and Artists
Employees:12,590
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deezer

Deezer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)

Deezer has 62.55% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Musicians Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yamaha Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deezer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deezer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yamaha Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yamaha Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deezer

Deezer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DEESUNGEN1784831487
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEEOPT1766231704
🔒 Incident : Breach
TENMYSTWITENCANADODEEFRIUNIBRA1769520245
Yamaha Corporation

Yamaha Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deezer company and Yamaha Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deezer and Yamaha Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deezer and Yamaha Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deezer or Yamaha Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deezer or Yamaha Corporation ?
Between Deezer and Yamaha Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deezer and Yamaha Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9