Comparison Overview
Deezer Research

Deezer Research
24, Rue de Calais, Paris, 75009, FR
Last Update: 02/02/2026
Deezer Research focuses on improving our music streaming service through research in machine learning, data science, and M.I.R. Our team works on developing innovative solutions to better understand and respond to user preferences, enhancing the overall listening experi...

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd., 6th floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Noida, 201305, IN
Last Update: 22/09/2026
IndiaMART is India's largest online B2B marketplace, connecting buyers with suppliers across a wide array of industries. IndiaMART provides a platform for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, and individual buyers, helping them access diverse portfolios...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Deezer Research







IndiaMART InterMESH Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deezer Research in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IndiaMART InterMESH Limited in 2026.
Incident History - Deezer Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deezer Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - IndiaMART InterMESH Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Deezer Research

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.