Comparison Overview
DeepSeek AI

DeepSeek AI
Hangzhou, CN
Last Update: 16/06/2026
DeepSeek (深度求索), founded in 2023, is a Chinese company dedicated to making AGI a reality. Unravel the mystery of AGI with curiosity. Answer the essential question with long-termism. 🐋

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
800 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, 06854, US
Last Update: 23/04/2026
Booking Holdings is the world’s leading provider of online travel & related services, provided to consumers and local partners in more than 220 countries and territories through six primary consumer-facing brands: Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, Rentalcars.com, KAYAK and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

DeepSeek AI







Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
DeepSeek AI has 37.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - DeepSeek AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DeepSeek AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

DeepSeek AI

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.