Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DECO SMARTDECO SMART
VS
Hobby LobbyHobby Lobby
DECO SMART

DECO SMART

GROUPE ADEO, Ronchin, undefined, 59790, FR

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deco-smart.com/
753/1000Fair

Créé en 2007, Deco-smart.com est le site référent de ventes privées d’articles déco et design. Des ventes flash qui durent entre 36 et 72 heures proposent une sélection d’articles de marques prestigieuses à prix réduits en France et en Espagne. Nous sélectionnons ave...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby

7707 Southwest 44th Street, Oklahoma City, OK, US, 73179

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hobbylobby.com
798/1000Fair

In 1970, entrepreneurs David and Barbara Green, along with their young family, began making miniature picture frames in their garage. A few years later, on August 3, 1972, the Green family opened the first Hobby Lobby store with a mere 300 square feet of retail space. ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:17,626
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DECO SMART

DECO SMART

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DECO SMART in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hobby Lobby in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DECO SMART (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DECO SMART cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hobby Lobby (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hobby Lobby cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DECO SMART

DECO SMART

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hobby Lobby

Hobby Lobby

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DECO SMART company and Hobby Lobby company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DECO SMART and Hobby Lobby, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DECO SMART and Hobby Lobby, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DECO SMART or Hobby Lobby ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DECO SMART or Hobby Lobby ?
Between DECO SMART and Hobby Lobby, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DECO SMART and Hobby Lobby, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9