Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.DeBra-Kuempel Inc.
VS
Rencol Components Ltd.Rencol Components Ltd.
DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

3976 Southern Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45227, US

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.debra-kuempel.com
747/1000Moderate

A wholly owned subsidiary of EMCOR Group, Inc., DeBra-Kuempel has been serving the local community for over 65 years by helping clients install and maintain a wide array of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, process piping, building automation, security monitoring and ot...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:361
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

Unit 2, Avonbridge Trading Estate, Bristol, BS11 9QD, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rencol.com
833/1000Good

Following 100 years of successful design and manufacturing experience in plastic and metals, Rencol Components has built a truly global supply chain - rapidly expanding our range of high-quality, competitively-priced industrial components. Rencol has developed a mature...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:11,548
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DeBra-Kuempel Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rencol Components Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DeBra-Kuempel Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DeBra-Kuempel Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rencol Components Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rencol Components Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rencol Components Ltd.

Rencol Components Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and Rencol Components Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and Rencol Components Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and Rencol Components Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DeBra-Kuempel Inc. or Rencol Components Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DeBra-Kuempel Inc. or Rencol Components Ltd. ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and Rencol Components Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and Rencol Components Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9