Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.DeBra-Kuempel Inc.
VS
FLSmidthFLSmidth
DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

3976 Southern Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45227, US

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.debra-kuempel.com
747/1000Moderate

A wholly owned subsidiary of EMCOR Group, Inc., DeBra-Kuempel has been serving the local community for over 65 years by helping clients install and maintain a wide array of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, process piping, building automation, security monitoring and ot...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:361
Subsidiaries:73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Vigerslev Allé 77, Copenhagen, Valby, DK, DK-2500

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fls.com
760/1000Fair

FLSmidth is a full flowsheet technology and service supplier to the global mining industry. We enable our customers to improve performance, lower operating costs and reduce environmental impact. MissionZero is our sustainability ambition towards zero emissions in mining...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:13,187
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DeBra-Kuempel Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLSmidth in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DeBra-Kuempel Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DeBra-Kuempel Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FLSmidth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLSmidth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

DeBra-Kuempel Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FLSmidth

FLSmidth

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. company and FLSmidth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and FLSmidth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DeBra-Kuempel Inc. or FLSmidth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DeBra-Kuempel Inc. or FLSmidth ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and FLSmidth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DeBra-Kuempel Inc. and FLSmidth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA