Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Deakin University Professional Practice CredentialsDeakin University Professional Practice Credentials
VS
The University of QueenslandThe University of Queensland
Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials

Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials

221 Burwood Hwy, Burwood, 3125, AU

Last Update: 18/12/2025

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Deakin’s Professional Practice credentials offer a new way to recognise the skills and knowledge you’ve developed through learning, work and experience.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The University of Queensland

The University of Queensland

St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4072

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.alumni.uq.edu.au/
802/1000Good

For more than a century, The University of Queensland (UQ) has maintained a global reputation for delivering knowledge leadership for a better world. The most prestigious and widely recognised rankings of world universities consistently place UQ among the world's top...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,312
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials

Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Queensland

The University of Queensland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Queensland in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Queensland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Queensland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials

Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The University of Queensland

The University of Queensland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials company and The University of Queensland company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials and The University of Queensland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials and The University of Queensland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials or The University of Queensland ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials or The University of Queensland ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials and The University of Queensland, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Deakin University Professional Practice Credentials and The University of Queensland, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1