Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Delta Dental of New Jersey and ConnecticutDelta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut
VS
HUB InternationalHUB International
Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut

Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut

1639 Route 10, Parsippany, NJ, US, 07054

Last Update: 12/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deltadentalnj.com
753/1000Fair

Delta Dental of New Jersey is a member of the national Delta Dental Plans Association, which serves nearly one-third of the estimated 166 million Americans with dental benefits, providing dental coverage to over 60 million people in nearly 111,000 groups across the nati...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:306
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HUB International

HUB International

300 North LaSalle, 17th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60654

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Hi, we’re HUB. We advise businesses and individuals on how to reach their goals. When you partner with us, you’re at the center of a vast network of risk, insurance, employee benefits, retirement and wealth management specialists that bring clarity to a changing world ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:16,164
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut

Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HUB International

HUB International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HUB International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HUB International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HUB International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut

Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HUB International

HUB International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HUB752072525

FAQ

Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut company and HUB International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut and HUB International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut and HUB International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut or HUB International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut or HUB International ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut and HUB International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Delta Dental of New Jersey and Connecticut and HUB International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8