Comparison Overview

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

VS

National Park Service

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Parliament Street, London, SW1A 2BQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.civil-service-careers.gov.uk/working-for-dcms-hub/

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport will focus on supporting culture, arts, media, sport, tourism and civil society across every part of England — recognising the UK’s world-leading position in these areas and the importance of these sectors in contributing so much to our economy, way of life and our reputation around the world. The department champions sport for all at every level, support our world-leading cultural and creative industries and enhance the cohesiveness of our communities. DCMS is a ministerial department, supported by 42 agencies and public bodies.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,508
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
16
Attack type number
4
View Profile

National Park Service

1849 C Street N.W., Washington, D.C., 20240, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nps.gov

Most people know that the National Park Service cares for national parks, a network of over 420 natural, cultural and recreational sites across the nation. The treasures in this system – the first of its kind in the world – have been set aside by the American people to preserve, protect, and share the legacies of this land. People from all around the world visit national parks to experience America's story, marvel at the natural wonders, and have fun. Places like the Grand Canyon, the Statue of Liberty, and Gettysburg are popular destinations, but so too are the hundreds of lesser known yet equally meaningful gems like Rosie the Riveter in California, Boston Harbor Islands in Massachusetts, and Russell Cave in Alabama. The American system of national parks was the first of its kind in the world, and provides a living model for other nations wishing to establish and manage their own protected areas. The park service actively consults with these Nations, sharing what we've learned, and gaining knowledge from the experience of others. Beyond national parks, the National Park Service helps communities across America preserve and enhance important local heritage and close-to-home recreational opportunities. Grants and assistance are offered to register, record and save historic places; create community parks and local recreation facilities; conserve rivers and streams, and develop trails and greenways.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,842
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dcmsgovuk.jpeg
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-park-service.jpeg
National Park Service
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Park Service
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Department for Culture, Media and Sport has 146.91% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Park Service in 2025.

Incident History — Department for Culture, Media and Sport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department for Culture, Media and Sport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Park Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Park Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dcmsgovuk.jpeg
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Exposure, Negligence, Insecure Work Practices
Motivation: None (Unintentional)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: third-party compromise (Dodd Group), gateway attack, phishing (likely), dark web data exfiltration
Motivation: financial gain (ransom threats), espionage, geopolitical disruption, reputation damage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-park-service.jpeg
National Park Service
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Park Service company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Department for Culture, Media and Sport company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas National Park Service company has not reported any.

In the current year, Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has reported more cyber incidents than National Park Service company.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while National Park Service company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other National Park Service company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while National Park Service company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while National Park Service company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to National Park Service company.

National Park Service company employs more people globally than Department for Culture, Media and Sport company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor National Park Service holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-11
Updated
Date
2025-12-11
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References