Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DCC VitalDCC Vital
VS
Queensland HealthQueensland Health
DCC Vital

DCC Vital

South County Business Park, Dublin 18, Dublin D18, IE

Last Update: 09/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dccvital.com
783/1000Fair

With a heritage dating back to 1829, DCC Vital specialises in the sales, marketing and distribution of a broad range of pharmaceuticals, medical, surgical and laboratory products to healthcare professionals and patients in the UK, Ireland and international markets. Our...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Queensland Health

Queensland Health

33 Charlotte Street, Brisbane, 4000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
797/1000Fair

Queensland Health is the state's largest healthcare provider. We are committed to ensuring all Queenslanders have access to a range of public healthcare services aimed at achieving good health and well-being. Through a network of 16 Hospital and Health Services, as wel...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:47,197
Subsidiaries:62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DCC Vital

DCC Vital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Queensland Health

Queensland Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DCC Vital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queensland Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DCC Vital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DCC Vital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Queensland Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queensland Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DCC Vital

DCC Vital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Queensland Health

Queensland Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DCC Vital company and Queensland Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DCC Vital and Queensland Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DCC Vital and Queensland Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DCC Vital or Queensland Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DCC Vital or Queensland Health ?
Between DCC Vital and Queensland Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DCC Vital and Queensland Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2