Comparison Overview

DC Metropolitan Police Department

VS

Metropolitan Police

DC Metropolitan Police Department

441 4th St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20001
Last Update: 2025-12-22
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://joinmpd.dc.gov

As one of the top 10 largest police departments in the country, the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police Department offers opportunities you won’t find anywhere else. From leading motorcades for the President of the United States and world leaders - to joining elite investigative units, our officers are at the forefront of policing in the nation’s capital. We routinely collaborate with federal agencies and are committed to impactful community policing. Here, you’ll be part of a department that is supported by the community and driven by service.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 1,319
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Metropolitan Police

Victoria Embankment, None, Westminster, London, GB, SW1A 2JL
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 650 and 699
http://www.met.police.uk

The Metropolitan Police Service is famed around the world and has a unique place in the history of policing. Our headquarters at New Scotland Yard - and its iconic revolving sign - has provided the backdrop to some of the most high profile and complex law enforcement investigations the world has ever seen. Founded by Sir Robert Peel in 1829, the original establishment of 1,000 officers policed a seven-mile radius from Charing Cross and a population of less than 2 million. Today, The Met employs 32,000 officers together with specialist support staff and more than 2,500 volunteer police officers in the Metropolitan Special Constabulary. As well as policing London’s 620 square miles and 8.9million population, The Met has national responsibility for a variety of specialist policing units and hosts the UK’s Counter Terrorism Policing HQ. The Met is one of the largest employers in London and with a broad range of roles, from neighbourhoods to firearms. We’re recruiting people who want to make a difference, to help people and begin a career in a brilliant organisation, performing an exciting and extremely rewarding role. Today, now more than ever, is the time to join the Met. www.met.police.uk/careers

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 19,151
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-metropolitan-police-department.jpeg
DC Metropolitan Police Department
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metpoliceuk.jpeg
Metropolitan Police
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DC Metropolitan Police Department
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metropolitan Police
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

DC Metropolitan Police Department has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Police in 2025.

Incident History — DC Metropolitan Police Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC Metropolitan Police Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metropolitan Police (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Police cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc-metropolitan-police-department.jpeg
DC Metropolitan Police Department
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial gain through resale of stolen devices
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metpoliceuk.jpeg
Metropolitan Police
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Illegal entry to IT systems
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Misdirected Emails, Unauthorized Access, Lost/Stolen Devices, Accidental Publication, Malicious Insiders, Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Disruption, Accidental
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Metropolitan Police company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DC Metropolitan Police Department company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DC Metropolitan Police Department and Metropolitan Police have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, DC Metropolitan Police Department company has reported more cyber incidents than Metropolitan Police company.

Both Metropolitan Police company and DC Metropolitan Police Department company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Both Metropolitan Police company and DC Metropolitan Police Department company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

DC Metropolitan Police Department company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Metropolitan Police company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department company nor Metropolitan Police company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department company nor Metropolitan Police company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Metropolitan Police company employs more people globally than DC Metropolitan Police Department company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DC Metropolitan Police Department nor Metropolitan Police holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References