Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DB SchenkerDB Schenker
VS
DSV - Global Transport and LogisticsDSV - Global Transport and Logistics
DB Schenker

DB Schenker

OO

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.dbschenker.com
803/1000Good

At DB Schenker, we're not just about logistics; we're about understanding what truly matters to you. As a global leader in transportation and logistics, we're dedicated to supporting industries and businesses worldwide in the seamless exchange of goods. Our integrated a...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:44,435
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

Hovedgaden 630, Hedehusene, DK, 2640

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.dsv.com
812/1000Good

At DSV, we keep supply chains flowing in a world of change. We provide and manage supply chain solutions for thousands of companies every day – from small family-run businesses to large global corporations. Our reach is global, yet our presence is local and close to our...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:52,926
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DB Schenker

DB Schenker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DB Schenker in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DSV - Global Transport and Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DB Schenker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DB Schenker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DSV - Global Transport and Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DB Schenker

DB Schenker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DB Schenker company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DB Schenker and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DB Schenker and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DB Schenker or DSV - Global Transport and Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DB Schenker or DSV - Global Transport and Logistics ?
Between DB Schenker and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DB Schenker and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA