Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DBS Working Capital AdvisoryDBS Working Capital Advisory
VS
FactSetFactSet
DBS Working Capital Advisory

DBS Working Capital Advisory

N/A

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

DBS offers a comprehensive suite of financing solutions, and digital capabilities, and is a place for fresh ideas and innovative thinking. Our Global Transaction Services unit provides cash management, trade finance, securities and fiduciary services, enabling better ca...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FactSet

FactSet

43 Glover Ave, Norwalk, Connecticut, US, 06850

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.factset.com
718/1000Moderate

FactSet creates flexible, open data and software solutions for tens of thousands of investment professionals around the world, providing instant access to financial data and analytics that investors use to make crucial decisions. For 40 years, through market changes a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:14,830
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DBS Working Capital Advisory

DBS Working Capital Advisory

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FactSet

FactSet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DBS Working Capital Advisory in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

FactSet has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DBS Working Capital Advisory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DBS Working Capital Advisory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FactSet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FactSet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DBS Working Capital Advisory

DBS Working Capital Advisory

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FactSet

FactSet

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAC1775047945

FAQ

Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory company and FactSet company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory and FactSet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory and FactSet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DBS Working Capital Advisory or FactSet ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DBS Working Capital Advisory or FactSet ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory and FactSet, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DBS Working Capital Advisory and FactSet, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA