Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DB FernverkehrDB Fernverkehr
VS
Hitachi RailHitachi Rail
DB Fernverkehr

DB Fernverkehr

N/A

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile

Willkommen in der Bahn zum Büro oder in den Feierabend, zum Geschäftstermin oder wieder zurück. Egal wohin die Fahrt geht, hier bekommst du Antworten auf deine Fragen. Außerdem findest du die Inhalte, die für dich wirklich wichtig sind: von neuen Angeboten im Bordbist...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:1,370
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

60 Ludgate Hill, 7th Floor, One New Ludgate, London, England, GB, EC4M 7AW

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hitachirail.com
786/1000Fair

Hitachi Rail is committed to driving a sustainable mobility transition and helping every passenger, customer and community enjoy more connected, seamless and sustainable transport. Hitachi Rail is a trusted partner to operators around the world with expertise across eve...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:15,028
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DB Fernverkehr

DB Fernverkehr

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DB Fernverkehr in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi Rail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - DB Fernverkehr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DB Fernverkehr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hitachi Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DB Fernverkehr

DB Fernverkehr

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HIT811071525

FAQ

Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DB Fernverkehr company and Hitachi Rail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DB Fernverkehr and Hitachi Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DB Fernverkehr and Hitachi Rail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DB Fernverkehr or Hitachi Rail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DB Fernverkehr or Hitachi Rail ?
Between DB Fernverkehr and Hitachi Rail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DB Fernverkehr and Hitachi Rail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8