Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Davies North AmericaDavies North America
VS
IntactIntact
Davies North America

Davies North America

PO Box 110259, Lakewood Ranch, 34211, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
689/1000Weak

We deliver professional services and technology solutions across the risk and insurance market, including claims, underwriting, distribution, regulation, customer experience, human capital, digital transformation and change management.    Our global team of more than 8...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:778
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Intact

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 0A1, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:20,853
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Davies North America

Davies North America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intact

Intact

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davies North America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Davies North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davies North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Davies North America

Davies North America

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DAV2113421112625
Intact

Intact

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Davies North America company and Intact company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Davies North America and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Davies North America and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Davies North America or Intact ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Davies North America or Intact ?
Between Davies North America and Intact, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Davies North America and Intact, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA