Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Datorama, a Salesforce CompanyDatorama, a Salesforce Company
VS
SnowflakeSnowflake
Datorama, a Salesforce Company

Datorama, a Salesforce Company

1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.datorama.com
785/1000Fair

AI-powered marketing intelligence. Make smarter decisions by connecting and acting on your marketing data and KPIs.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:89
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Snowflake

Snowflake

Menlo Park, CA, US, 94563

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.snowflake.com
100/1000Critical

Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed d...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,807
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
19
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Datorama, a Salesforce Company

Datorama, a Salesforce Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Snowflake

Snowflake

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Datorama, a Salesforce Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Snowflake has 566.67% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Datorama, a Salesforce Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Datorama, a Salesforce Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Datorama, a Salesforce Company

Datorama, a Salesforce Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DAT1804218112125
Snowflake

Snowflake

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1779855877
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCANOSNO1776126436
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANO1775660105

FAQ

Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company company and Snowflake company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company and Snowflake, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Datorama, a Salesforce Company or Snowflake ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Datorama, a Salesforce Company or Snowflake ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company and Snowflake, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Datorama, a Salesforce Company and Snowflake, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2