Comparison Overview

DataSecure Inc

VS

Capita

DataSecure Inc

Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

As a security service provider, we strive to be a world leader in everything related to information security; from the preservation of confidentiality, integrity and availability of information to the protection of information and information systems from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification firewall management services, combating advanced persistent threats to ensuring your PCI readiness for compliance. Our Global Headquarters is located in McLean, Virginia, USA with regional offices in Nairobi – Kenya, Harare – Zimbabwe, and Johannesburg, South Africa - we ensure business resilience with secure and compliant business processes, applications, information, and infrastructures. DataSecure combines industry expertise with business continuity and security capabilities to help organizations ensure governance, minimize risk, and demonstrate compliance. Many industries and IT security companies need assistance in maintaining or even building a new infrastructure for their information security and we have the expert security analysts to assist you along the way through consulting, audits, assessments, and tests. At DataSecure we understand that effective data security is more than just putting out fires. We assist organizations identify how they use information to meet their strategic business goals; then determine the best ways to protect their information assets through the information surety life cycle. We at DataSecure strongly believe that information security should be escalated from being an IT responsibility to being a 'Business'​ requirement

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Capita

2 Kingdom Street, First Floor, London, England, GB, W2 6BD
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 550 and 599

Capita is an outsourcer, helping clients across the public and private sectors run complex business processes more efficiently, creating better consumer experiences. Operating across eight countries, Capita’s 34,000 colleagues support primarily UK and European clients with people-based services underpinned by market-leading technology. We’re a vital support service for our clients, enabling the everyday interactions that we expect to run seamlessly, to run seamlessly. A publicly listed business with adjusted revenue of £2.4bn, Capita’s areas of focus are Central Government, Local Public Service, Defence, Learning, Fire & Security, Contact Centres and Pensions Solutions. We’re embracing change to respond to the ever-changing needs of society, creating better outcomes for all our stakeholders.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 25,672
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datasecure-inc.jpeg
DataSecure Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capita.jpeg
Capita
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DataSecure Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capita
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DataSecure Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capita in 2025.

Incident History — DataSecure Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DataSecure Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datasecure-inc.jpeg
DataSecure Inc
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capita.jpeg
Capita
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Access to internal Microsoft Office 365 apps
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious File Download (Phishing/Social Engineering)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Demand, Data Exfiltration for Leverage)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

DataSecure Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capita company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Capita company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to DataSecure Inc company.

In the current year, Capita company and DataSecure Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Capita company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while DataSecure Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Capita company has disclosed at least one data breach, while DataSecure Inc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Capita company nor DataSecure Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

DataSecure Inc company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Capita company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capita company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DataSecure Inc company.

Capita company employs more people globally than DataSecure Inc company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DataSecure Inc nor Capita holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X