Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DatadogDatadog
VS
SS&C TechnologiesSS&C Technologies
Datadog

Datadog

620 8th Ave, New York, 10018, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://datadoghq.com
814/1000Good

Datadog is the essential monitoring platform for cloud applications. We bring together data from servers, containers, databases, and third-party services to make your stack entirely observable. These capabilities help DevOps teams avoid downtime, resolve performance iss...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,829
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SS&C Technologies

SS&C Technologies

80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT, US, 06095

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ssctech.com
792/1000Fair

SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 22,000 fi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:25,837
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Datadog

Datadog

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SS&C Technologies

SS&C Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Datadog has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SS&C Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Datadog (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Datadog cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SS&C Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SS&C Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Datadog

Datadog

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SENCLO1786454995
SS&C Technologies

SS&C Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SSC173329622

FAQ

Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Datadog company and SS&C Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Datadog and SS&C Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Datadog and SS&C Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Datadog or SS&C Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Datadog or SS&C Technologies ?
Between Datadog and SS&C Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Datadog and SS&C Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9