Comparison Overview
Databarracks

Databarracks
1 Bridges Court, London, SW11 3BB, GB
Last Update: 21/07/2026
Databarracks is the business and technology resilience expert. In 2003, we launched one of the world’s first managed Backup services to bring indestructible resilience to mission critical data. Today, we deliver award-winning Data Protection, Public Cloud and Busin...

Cognizant
300 Frank W Burr Blvd, Teaneck, 07666, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Cognizant (Nasdaq: CTSH) is an AI Builder and technology services provider, bridging the gap between AI investment and enterprise value. We build full-stack AI solutions powered by deep industry, process and engineering expertise — embedding an organization's unique co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Databarracks







Cognizant






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Databarracks in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Cognizant has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Databarracks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Databarracks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cognizant (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cognizant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Databarracks

Cognizant
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.