Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Darling Downs Hospital and Health ServiceDarling Downs Hospital and Health Service
VS
Elevance HealthElevance Health
Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service

Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service

Office Chief Executive, Jofre, Level 1, Baillie Henderson Hospital, Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service, PO Box 405, Toowoomba, Queensland, AU, 4350

Last Update: 13/02/2026

View Profile
765/1000Fair

Darling Downs Health provides healthcare to more than 300,000 people across 30 facilities. We are one of the largest employers in the region with over 6,000 people working across 90,000 square kilometres. Our people are at the heart of everything we do. In front of a ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:707
Subsidiaries:61
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Elevance Health

Elevance Health

220 Virginia Ave, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46204

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
830/1000Good

Fueled by our bold purpose to improve the health of humanity, we are transforming from a traditional health benefits organization into a lifetime trusted health partner.   Our nearly 100,000 associates serve more than 118 million people, at every stage of health. We ad...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:43,897
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service

Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Elevance Health

Elevance Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elevance Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Elevance Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elevance Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service

Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Elevance Health

Elevance Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service company and Elevance Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service and Elevance Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service and Elevance Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service or Elevance Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service or Elevance Health ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service and Elevance Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Darling Downs Hospital and Health Service and Elevance Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90603
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Anil-matcha Open-Generative-AI up to 1.0.11/2.0.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /api/upload-binary of the component S3 Upload. Such manipulation of the argument x-proxy-target-url leads to unrestricted upload. The attack may be launched remotely. The name of the patch is f013270957f75e439eaf97eb2a93decb32a4543e. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-13
UPDATED
Date2026-09-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-90602
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Anil-matcha Open-Generative-AI up to 1.0.11/2.0.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function renderHistory of the file ImageStudio.js of the component Studio Components. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-13
UPDATED
Date2026-09-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-90601
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in getzep graphiti up to 0.30.2. Affected is an unknown function of the file server/graph_service/main.py of the component REST API. The manipulation results in improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-13
UPDATED
Date2026-09-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-90600
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in itsourcecode Sales and Inventory System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/inv_edit1.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-13
UPDATED
Date2026-09-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15892
SUMMARY

The mcumgr SMP settings-management group handlers settings_mgmt_read(), settings_mgmt_write(), and settings_mgmt_delete() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/grp/settings_mgmt/src/settings_mgmt.c allocate a key_name buffer (and, for read, a data buffer) via k_malloc() when CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_SETTINGS_BUFFER_TYPE_HEAP is enabled, relying on the end: label to k_free() them. When CONFIG_MCUMGR_GRP_SETTINGS_ACCESS_HOOK is also enabled and the application access hook rejects a request by returning status MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC, the handler executed return ret_rc; directly, bypassing end: and leaking the heap allocation on every rejected request. The settings handlers are reachable over the unauthenticated SMP transport (Bluetooth LE, UART, or UDP, depending on product configuration). The access hook is the mechanism applications use to deny unauthorized settings access, and MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC is a common rejection style, so an attacker who can send settings read/write/delete commands that the hook rejects triggers a heap leak on each attempt. Because the leaked memory is never reclaimed until reboot, a sustained stream of rejected requests monotonically exhausts the kernel heap until k_malloc() fails, denying mcumgr service and impacting any other heap consumer on the device — a denial of service. The impact is availability-only; there is no memory corruption or information disclosure. Only configurations that select the heap buffer type, enable the access hook, and register a hook that returns MGMT_CB_ERROR_RC are affected (the default stack buffer type cannot leak).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-13
UPDATED
Date2026-09-13
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9