Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tripadvisor 猫途鹰Tripadvisor 猫途鹰
VS
ProsusProsus
Tripadvisor 猫途鹰

Tripadvisor 猫途鹰

Building 18, 968 Jinzhong Road, Changning District, Shanghai, Shanghai, 200335, CN

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tripadvisor.cn
766/1000Fair

Tripadvisor(官方中文名:猫途鹰)(纳斯达克: TRIP)是全球领先的旅游平台,每月帮助近4.6亿旅行者获得每次旅行中的更多精彩体验。来自全球的旅行者可通过猫途鹰(Tripadvisor)网站和App浏览超过860万个住宿、餐厅、景点玩乐、航空公司和邮轮信息,以及超过8.3亿条点评和建议。无论是计划旅行还是旅行途中,旅行者都可通过猫途鹰(Tripadvisor)比较酒店、航班和邮轮的更低价格, 预订热门景点和玩乐体验, 以及预订一流餐厅。

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:52
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prosus

Prosus

Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082MS

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://prosus.com
789/1000Fair

Prosus is the power behind the world’s leading lifestyle e-commerce brands. Bringing together bold ideas and the power of AI, Prosus builds technology ecosystems where lifestyle ecommerce brands can become global success stories. These ecosystems span three core geogra...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,350
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tripadvisor 猫途鹰

Tripadvisor 猫途鹰

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prosus

Prosus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosus in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prosus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tripadvisor 猫途鹰

Tripadvisor 猫途鹰

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prosus

Prosus

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 company and Prosus company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 and Prosus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 and Prosus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 or Prosus ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 or Prosus ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 and Prosus, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tripadvisor 猫途鹰 and Prosus, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8