Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Danfoss Climate SolutionsDanfoss Climate Solutions
VS
Liebherr GroupLiebherr Group
Danfoss Climate Solutions

Danfoss Climate Solutions

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, 6430, DK

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile

At Danfoss Climate Solutions, we engineer energy-efficient heating and cooling solutions to help the world get more out of less.    Through our leading application know-how and innovative technologies, we enable a decarbonized, digital, and more sustainable tomorrow –...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:1,282
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

Liebherr-International Deutschland GmbH, Biberach, 88400, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.liebherr.com
776/1000Fair

Established in 1949, the Liebherr Group today is not only one of the biggest construction equipment manufacturers in the world, but also offers high-quality, user-oriented products and services in many other areas. The family-run technology company employs nearly 50,000...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:10,864
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Danfoss Climate Solutions

Danfoss Climate Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danfoss Climate Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liebherr Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Danfoss Climate Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss Climate Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Liebherr Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liebherr Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Danfoss Climate Solutions

Danfoss Climate Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Liebherr Group

Liebherr Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions company and Liebherr Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions and Liebherr Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions and Liebherr Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Danfoss Climate Solutions or Liebherr Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Danfoss Climate Solutions or Liebherr Group ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions and Liebherr Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Danfoss Climate Solutions and Liebherr Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA