Comparison Overview

Dancing in the Streets

VS

The Cutting Ball Theater

Dancing in the Streets

2825 3rd Ave, Bronx , New York, 10455, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Dancing in the Streets, based in the South Bronx, develops movement-based projects through long term initiatives, integrating rigorous inquiry, artistic exploration, deep community engagement, and the nurturing of urban artists. Our three main areas of activity: Resident Artists - based in communities, to nurture individual creativity, and build bridges across generations, communities, and cultures. The Incubator - supporting and developing new generations of artists in dance and social practice. It's Showtime NYC! - nurturing emerging urban dance artists, and advocating the value, and importance of Hip Hop culture in NYC, nationally and internationally. Founded in 1984, Dancing in the Streets has produced and presented over 500 free public performances by over 300 contemporary artists, including site-specific productions at spectacular urban sites by Meredith Monk, Ann Carlson, Douglas Dunn, Eiko & Koma, Joanna Haigood, Steve Koplowitz, Tere O’Connor, Elizabeth Streb, Reggie Wilson, and Yasuko Yakoshi. In its early years, Dancing in the Streets fostered site-specific work as a public art form across New York City, the U.S. and internationally. Since 2001, Dancing in the Streets has been an urban pioneer, producing dance performances in unknown sites throughout the NYC metropolitan area, including the massive Port Authority Grain Terminal in Red Hook, the Tobacco Warehouse in Brooklyn Bridge Park, Fort Jay on Governor’s Island, Hangar B at Brooklyn’s Floyd Bennett Field, and in the streets of the South Bronx.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Cutting Ball Theater

277 Taylor Street, San Francisco, CA, 94102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Cutting Ball Theater is an experimental theater, presenting plays in our intimate space, to connect Bay Area audiences and artists through shared moments of live storytelling. Our plays center historically-excluded voices and experiences, and challenge the norms of how stories are told. We support artists in exploring their creativity, in working environments where personal well-being is our priority. The Tenderloin of San Francisco is our home, and we are committed to being an accountable partner to our neighbors. When we say experimental, we mean . . . We experiment with the “how” of telling stories, onstage: challenging traditions and conventions of American theater, developing methods and techniques, and empowering artists to pursue uncharted pathways to creative outcomes. When you see a play at Cutting Ball, our goal is for you to experience something new. When we say intimate, we mean . . . We present our plays in a small “black box” venue where you’re never more than three rows away from the action. We value being up-close to stories, immersed and invested in the world of the play and its characters. When we say historically-excluded, we mean . . . American theater (and Western theater, more broadly) - including Cutting Ball - has historically been disproportionately shaped by the stories and voices of the dominant culture: people who are male, white, cisgender, heterosexual, and/or non-disabled. At Cutting Ball, we acknowledge our role in this historical exclusion and are now committed to reseating misrepresented and underrepresented individuals as agents of their own storytelling. When we say Tenderloin, we mean . . . The Tenderloin neighborhood is home to individuals and families, including immigrants, people of color, people experiencing poverty and food insecurity, and people who are unhoused. The Tenderloin is also a close community of individuals and families.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-cutting-ball-theater.jpeg
The Cutting Ball Theater
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dancing in the Streets
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Cutting Ball Theater
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dancing in the Streets in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Cutting Ball Theater in 2025.

Incident History — Dancing in the Streets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dancing in the Streets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Cutting Ball Theater (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Cutting Ball Theater cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-cutting-ball-theater.jpeg
The Cutting Ball Theater
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dancing in the Streets company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Cutting Ball Theater company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Cutting Ball Theater company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dancing in the Streets company.

In the current year, The Cutting Ball Theater company and Dancing in the Streets company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Cutting Ball Theater company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Cutting Ball Theater company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Cutting Ball Theater company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor The Cutting Ball Theater company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor The Cutting Ball Theater company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Cutting Ball Theater company employs more people globally than Dancing in the Streets company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor The Cutting Ball Theater holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N