Comparison Overview

Dancing in the Streets

VS

Big Art Group

Dancing in the Streets

2825 3rd Ave, Bronx , New York, 10455, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Dancing in the Streets, based in the South Bronx, develops movement-based projects through long term initiatives, integrating rigorous inquiry, artistic exploration, deep community engagement, and the nurturing of urban artists. Our three main areas of activity: Resident Artists - based in communities, to nurture individual creativity, and build bridges across generations, communities, and cultures. The Incubator - supporting and developing new generations of artists in dance and social practice. It's Showtime NYC! - nurturing emerging urban dance artists, and advocating the value, and importance of Hip Hop culture in NYC, nationally and internationally. Founded in 1984, Dancing in the Streets has produced and presented over 500 free public performances by over 300 contemporary artists, including site-specific productions at spectacular urban sites by Meredith Monk, Ann Carlson, Douglas Dunn, Eiko & Koma, Joanna Haigood, Steve Koplowitz, Tere O’Connor, Elizabeth Streb, Reggie Wilson, and Yasuko Yakoshi. In its early years, Dancing in the Streets fostered site-specific work as a public art form across New York City, the U.S. and internationally. Since 2001, Dancing in the Streets has been an urban pioneer, producing dance performances in unknown sites throughout the NYC metropolitan area, including the massive Port Authority Grain Terminal in Red Hook, the Tobacco Warehouse in Brooklyn Bridge Park, Fort Jay on Governor’s Island, Hangar B at Brooklyn’s Floyd Bennett Field, and in the streets of the South Bronx.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Big Art Group

10011, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

BIG ART GROUP is a New York City performance company founded in 1999. The company uses the language of media and blended states of performance in a unique form to build culturally transgressive and challenging new works. With its core group of members and additional collaborators, each work of Caden Manson/Big Art Group is first developed and presented in New York before touring nationally and internationally. The company has performed at venues in Berlin, Paris, Rome, Zurich, Glasgow, Dublin, Brussels and many others. Co-producers include Hebbel Am Ufer; Vienna Festwochen; Festival d’Automne à Paris; Le Studio/Maison des Arts de Créteil; Künstlerhaus Mousonturm; The Wexner Center for the Arts; The Kitchen; Performance Space 122.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-art-group.jpeg
Big Art Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dancing in the Streets
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Big Art Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dancing in the Streets in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Art Group in 2025.

Incident History — Dancing in the Streets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dancing in the Streets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Big Art Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Art Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dancing-in-the-streets.jpeg
Dancing in the Streets
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-art-group.jpeg
Big Art Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Big Art Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dancing in the Streets company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Big Art Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dancing in the Streets company.

In the current year, Big Art Group company and Dancing in the Streets company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Big Art Group company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Big Art Group company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Big Art Group company nor Dancing in the Streets company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Big Art Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dancing in the Streets company nor Big Art Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dancing in the Streets company employs more people globally than Big Art Group company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dancing in the Streets nor Big Art Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N