Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dana TM4Dana TM4
VS
Lear CorporationLear Corporation
Dana TM4

Dana TM4

135 Rue J.-A.-Bombardier, Boucherville, Québec, J4B 8P1, CA

Last Update: 26/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danatm4.com
750/1000Fair

Dana TM4 is a joint venture between Dana Incorporated and Hydro-Québec. The company designs and manufactures low- to high-voltage electric motors, generators, inverters and control systems suitable for the automotive, commercial, off-highway, marine, rail, motorsports, ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:672
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lear Corporation

Lear Corporation

21557 Telegraph Rd, Southfield , 48033, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lear.com
767/1000Fair

Lear Corporation (NYSE: LEA) is a global automotive leader in Seating and E-Systems. The company designs, manufactures, and delivers advanced technologies to the world’s major automakers. Building on more than 100 years of heritage, Lear is the largest U.S.-based automo...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:50,575
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dana TM4

Dana TM4

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lear Corporation

Lear Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dana TM4 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lear Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dana TM4 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dana TM4 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lear Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lear Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dana TM4

Dana TM4

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lear Corporation

Lear Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dana TM4 company and Lear Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dana TM4 and Lear Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dana TM4 and Lear Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dana TM4 or Lear Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dana TM4 or Lear Corporation ?
Between Dana TM4 and Lear Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dana TM4 and Lear Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1