Comparison Overview

Danaher Corporation

VS

Edwards Lifesciences

Danaher Corporation

2200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20037, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Danaher is a leading global life sciences and diagnostics innovator, committed to accelerating the power of science and technology to improve human health. We partner with customers across the globe to help them solve their most complex challenges, architecting solutions that bring the power of science to life. Our global teams are pioneering what’s next across Life Sciences, Diagnostics, Biotechnology and beyond. For more information, visit www.danaher.com.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 53,849
Subsidiaries: 43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edwards Lifesciences

One Edwards Way, None, Irvine, CA, US, 92614
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE: EW), is the leading global structural heart innovation company, driven by a passion to improve patient lives. Through breakthrough technologies, world-class evidence and partnerships with clinicians and healthcare stakeholders, our employees are inspired by our patient-focused culture to deliver life-changing innovations to those who need them most. We thrive on discovery and expanding the boundaries of medical technology, serving patients in 100+ countries, with the help of our employees in areas including Clinical Affairs, Quality Engineering, Research & Development, Regulatory Affairs, Sales & Marketing, corporate functions and more.  Contact Us We want to hear from you and engage in meaningful discussions. However, please note that we are not equipped to provide customer, candidate, or technical support through this platform. If you require assistance from those teams, please find their contact information here: https://www.edwards.com/aboutus/contactus If you’re a patient in need of medical advice, please contact your healthcare provider directly. We reserve the right to remove any comments that are off-topic, repetitive, or include hate speech, profanity, or offensive language. Additionally, we will not engage in discussions about competitor products, off-label use of Edwards products, or unsubstantiated/misleading claims that could cause harm. All Terms and Conditions of LinkedIn apply. For the Edwards Lifesciences privacy policy, visit https://www.edwards.com/legal/privacypolicy.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 13,399
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danaher.jpeg
Danaher Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-lifesciences.jpeg
Edwards Lifesciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Danaher Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edwards Lifesciences
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danaher Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edwards Lifesciences in 2025.

Incident History — Danaher Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danaher Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edwards Lifesciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards Lifesciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danaher.jpeg
Danaher Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-lifesciences.jpeg
Edwards Lifesciences
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Danaher Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edwards Lifesciences company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edwards Lifesciences company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Danaher Corporation company.

In the current year, Edwards Lifesciences company and Danaher Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edwards Lifesciences company nor Danaher Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edwards Lifesciences company nor Danaher Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edwards Lifesciences company nor Danaher Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Danaher Corporation company nor Edwards Lifesciences company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danaher Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Edwards Lifesciences company.

Danaher Corporation company employs more people globally than Edwards Lifesciences company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Danaher Corporation nor Edwards Lifesciences holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N